Home
FacebookSearchMenu
  • Subscribe (free)
  • Subscribe (free)
  • News
  • Features
  • TravelInfo
  • Columns
  • Community
  • Sponsored
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send Us News

Share

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

DHA advisory sows confusion

09 Jan 2019 - by Dave Marsh
Comments | 0

HAVING relaxed rules to allow

children, travelling on a foreign

passport with both parents,

to exit and enter SA without

carrying their birth certificate,

the Department of Home

Affairs issued a statement on

its website the following day

stating the opposite.

Airlines’ check-in staff around

the world have been advised. 

to follow this advisory and not

the redrafted regulations that

were gazetted on November

30 and heralded with much

fanfare by government.

Throughout this saga, Home

Affairs has been sharply

criticised for its refusal to

engage with the travel and

tourism sector and this

represents a further setback

for SA’s attempts to win back

a reputation as a child-friendly

destination.

Home Affairs now justifies

the advisory on the basis that

it gives effect to the Children’s

Act of 2005.

A spokesperson for Genevabased Iata, which uses its

Timatic system to advise

check-in staff of its member

airlines on what travel

documentation travellers need,

told TNW that they had been

advised by SA government

sources to use the advisory,

which states: “3.1. Where

both parents are travelling

accompanied by one or

more of their children, such

children have to produce

valid passports and a Birth

Certificate (BC) for each child

travelling.”

This is in complete

contradiction to the

Immigration Act Amendment.

Associate Professor of

Law at Wits, Prof Victoria

Bronstein commented to TNW

that when viewed in context

this appears to be some

rear-guard action against the

regulations.

“Although the document

claims that the requirements

for children travelling to or

from SA is aimed at giving

effect to the Children’s Act,

2005, the Children’s Act has

nothing specific to say about

this issue. It appears that

the procedures for enacting

Regulations in the Immigration

Act are being circumvented

by this informal advisory. If

the amended Regulations

are in force, this advisory is

illegitimate.

“The current confusion

about the requirements for

children entering South Africa

also suggests confusion

and lack of transparency

that cuts against rule of

law requirements in the

Constitution,” said the

Professor.

In the meantime, airlines

around the world are

compelled to continue to deny

boarding to children without

birth certificates.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.

AARTO: Double trouble for car rental

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Qatar ups winter schedule to Africa

Yesterday
Comments | 0

African airlines trail in own market

Yesterday
Comments | 0

French attractions plan fee hike

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Feature: 30 years representing Silversea in SA

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Lemala enters Kenya market with new acquisition

Yesterday
Comments | 0

New waterpark planned for NCL island

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Air travel round-up: New routes for Discover Airlines

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Latest Changes on Travelinfo (31 Jul '25)

Yesterday
Comments | 0

Consultants can’t fix airlines alone

30 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

School tours not for rookies

30 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

EU travel industry opposes ETIAS hike

30 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

KQ and TC sign MoU

30 Jul 2025
Comments | 0
  • Load more

FeatureClick to view

Travel technology July 2025

Poll

How many different booking systems would you say you interact with on a daily basis to fulfil client travel requests?
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Travel News on Facebook
  • Travel News RSS
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send Us News