Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe (free)
  • Subscribe (free)
  • News
  • Features
  • TravelInfo
  • Columns
  • Community
  • Sponsored
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send Us News

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

DHA advisory sows confusion

09 Jan 2019 - by Dave Marsh
Comments | 0

HAVING relaxed rules to allow

children, travelling on a foreign

passport with both parents,

to exit and enter SA without

carrying their birth certificate,

the Department of Home

Affairs issued a statement on

its website the following day

stating the opposite.

Airlines’ check-in staff around

the world have been advised. 

to follow this advisory and not

the redrafted regulations that

were gazetted on November

30 and heralded with much

fanfare by government.

Throughout this saga, Home

Affairs has been sharply

criticised for its refusal to

engage with the travel and

tourism sector and this

represents a further setback

for SA’s attempts to win back

a reputation as a child-friendly

destination.

Home Affairs now justifies

the advisory on the basis that

it gives effect to the Children’s

Act of 2005.

A spokesperson for Genevabased Iata, which uses its

Timatic system to advise

check-in staff of its member

airlines on what travel

documentation travellers need,

told TNW that they had been

advised by SA government

sources to use the advisory,

which states: “3.1. Where

both parents are travelling

accompanied by one or

more of their children, such

children have to produce

valid passports and a Birth

Certificate (BC) for each child

travelling.”

This is in complete

contradiction to the

Immigration Act Amendment.

Associate Professor of

Law at Wits, Prof Victoria

Bronstein commented to TNW

that when viewed in context

this appears to be some

rear-guard action against the

regulations.

“Although the document

claims that the requirements

for children travelling to or

from SA is aimed at giving

effect to the Children’s Act,

2005, the Children’s Act has

nothing specific to say about

this issue. It appears that

the procedures for enacting

Regulations in the Immigration

Act are being circumvented

by this informal advisory. If

the amended Regulations

are in force, this advisory is

illegitimate.

“The current confusion

about the requirements for

children entering South Africa

also suggests confusion

and lack of transparency

that cuts against rule of

law requirements in the

Constitution,” said the

Professor.

In the meantime, airlines

around the world are

compelled to continue to deny

boarding to children without

birth certificates.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.

Is the tide turning against adult-only offerings?

12 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Train travel round-up

10 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Latest Changes on Travelinfo (10Jun25)

10 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Tariffs to cause car rental ripple effect

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Introducing E-Rewards: The smarter way to earn with Europcar

Sponsored
09 Jun 2025

FlySafair launches AI ‘travel agent’

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Air Zim sells aircraft under ‘financial stress’

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Creecy intervenes in ACSA baggage battle

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Feature: Airlink expands network, enhances connectivity

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Indonesia tightens visa extension rules

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Oceania welcomes celeb chefs aboard

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

UK town revamps historic maritime attractions

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0

Latest Changes on Travelinfo (09Jun25)

09 Jun 2025
Comments | 0
  • Load more

FeatureClick to view

Weddings & honeymoons June 2025

Poll

Is there a need to upskill on domestic destination knowledge to better serve budget-conscious travellers?
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Travel News on Facebook
  • eTNW Twitter
  • Travel News RSS
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send Us News