Home
FacebookSearchMenu
  • Subscribe (free)
  • Subscribe (free)
  • News
  • Features
  • TravelInfo
  • Columns
  • Community
  • Sponsored
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send Us News

Share

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

DHA advisory sows confusion

09 Jan 2019 - by Dave Marsh
Comments | 0

HAVING relaxed rules to allow

children, travelling on a foreign

passport with both parents,

to exit and enter SA without

carrying their birth certificate,

the Department of Home

Affairs issued a statement on

its website the following day

stating the opposite.

Airlines’ check-in staff around

the world have been advised. 

to follow this advisory and not

the redrafted regulations that

were gazetted on November

30 and heralded with much

fanfare by government.

Throughout this saga, Home

Affairs has been sharply

criticised for its refusal to

engage with the travel and

tourism sector and this

represents a further setback

for SA’s attempts to win back

a reputation as a child-friendly

destination.

Home Affairs now justifies

the advisory on the basis that

it gives effect to the Children’s

Act of 2005.

A spokesperson for Genevabased Iata, which uses its

Timatic system to advise

check-in staff of its member

airlines on what travel

documentation travellers need,

told TNW that they had been

advised by SA government

sources to use the advisory,

which states: “3.1. Where

both parents are travelling

accompanied by one or

more of their children, such

children have to produce

valid passports and a Birth

Certificate (BC) for each child

travelling.”

This is in complete

contradiction to the

Immigration Act Amendment.

Associate Professor of

Law at Wits, Prof Victoria

Bronstein commented to TNW

that when viewed in context

this appears to be some

rear-guard action against the

regulations.

“Although the document

claims that the requirements

for children travelling to or

from SA is aimed at giving

effect to the Children’s Act,

2005, the Children’s Act has

nothing specific to say about

this issue. It appears that

the procedures for enacting

Regulations in the Immigration

Act are being circumvented

by this informal advisory. If

the amended Regulations

are in force, this advisory is

illegitimate.

“The current confusion

about the requirements for

children entering South Africa

also suggests confusion

and lack of transparency

that cuts against rule of

law requirements in the

Constitution,” said the

Professor.

In the meantime, airlines

around the world are

compelled to continue to deny

boarding to children without

birth certificates.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.

Breaking News: FlySafair pilot strike ends

Today 13:29
Comments | 0

NCL unveils 2027 itineraries

29 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Disney World to launch animation showcase

29 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Latest Changes on Travelinfo (29 Jul '25)

29 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

SAA to launch CPT-MRU route

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Southern Sun secures new Umhlanga hotel

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

The next chapter for RMS St Helena

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Feature: Car Hire Brokers: 27 years of reliable rentals

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Turkey restricts e-SIMs

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Hapag-Lloyd launches Africa cruise series

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Former casino reimagined as multi-use precinct

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

World’s new tallest hotel for Dubai

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0

Latest Changes on Travelinfo (28 Jul '25)

28 Jul 2025
Comments | 0
  • Load more

FeatureClick to view

Travel technology July 2025

Poll

How many different booking systems would you say you interact with on a daily basis to fulfil client travel requests?
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Travel News on Facebook
  • Travel News RSS
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send Us News